Curated by Justin Bailey
In one sentence: Dan Wallace argues for the reliability of the New Testament by emphasizing the unparalleled manuscript evidence, early textual transmission, and the rigorous process of textual criticism.
Why it matters:
The reliability of the New Testament is central to Christian apologetics and faith, as it underpins the historical credibility of Jesus’ life, teachings, death, and resurrection. Wallace's work provides a scholarly basis for confidence in the text’s preservation and integrity.
State of play:
Dan Wallace is a leading scholar in New Testament textual criticism and presents the following points in his case:
- Manuscript evidence: The New Testament has over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, far exceeding any other ancient work in quantity and closeness in time to the originals. The earliest fragments date within decades of the original writings.
- Early textual transmission: Wallace emphasizes the rapid and widespread copying of the New Testament texts, which minimizes the opportunity for intentional alterations or loss of core content.
- Textual variants: While there are many textual variants, Wallace highlights that the vast majority are minor (e.g., spelling differences) and do not affect essential Christian doctrines.
- Methodology of textual criticism: Wallace advocates for the reliability of critical methods, which work to reconstruct the original text by comparing manuscripts, taking into account geographical distribution and scribal tendencies.
Yes, but:
Skeptics counter that:
- Variants matter: While most variants are minor, skeptics argue that significant variants, such as the longer ending of Mark or the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11), challenge the idea of a wholly reliable text.
- Time gap: Even with the early fragments, there remains a gap between the originals and the earliest complete manuscripts, leaving room for uncertainty about the autographs.
- Theological influence: Some critics suggest that the scribes may have been influenced by theological motives, potentially shaping the text to align with developing Christian orthodoxy.
Between the lines:
Wallace’s case depends not on the absolute perfection of the manuscript tradition but on its relative trustworthiness compared to other ancient works. His arguments also lean heavily on the robustness of modern textual criticism to detect and account for errors.
Zoom out:
Wallace's defense reflects a broader effort among evangelical scholars to show that the New Testament is historically credible without demanding inerrancy of the transmission process. His approach acknowledges textual difficulties while maintaining the integrity of the core message.
The bottom line:
Dan Wallace's case for the reliability of the New Testament rests on its unmatched manuscript evidence, the early and widespread distribution of texts, and the rigorous methods of textual criticism, which collectively ensure that the New Testament we have today is a highly reliable representation of the originals. However, questions remain about certain textual variations and the role of early scribes in shaping the tradition.
Follow Up Questions
What are the specific techniques used in textual criticism that contribute to the reliability of the New Testament texts? (Coming Soon)
How do scholars reconcile significant textual variants, such as the longer ending of Mark or the Pericope Adulterae, with claims of textual reliability? (Coming Soon)
Can the large number of manuscripts and their early dating conclusively minimize the potential for doctrinal bias in the New Testament transcriptions? (Coming Soon)
How has the field of textual criticism evolved in recent years to enhance the accuracy of reconstructing the New Testament? (Coming Soon)
What are the major arguments against the reliability of the New Testament cited by skeptics, and how are these addressed by scholars like Dan Wallace? (Coming Soon)
How does the methodology of textual criticism differ when applied to religious texts like the New Testament compared to other ancient historical documents? (Coming Soon)
In what ways do geographical variations in manuscript evidence impact the study of the New Testament's textual integrity? (Coming Soon)
What role does the analysis of scribal tendencies play in understanding the historical context of the New Testament manuscripts? (Coming Soon)
How do proponents of New Testament reliability deal with the time gap between original writings and existing manuscripts? (Coming Soon)
What are the implications of Dan Wallace's research on New Testament reliability for contemporary Christian practice and faith? (Coming Soon)
Justin Bailey – Creator of ChristianAnswers.ai
All answers are curated and manually reviewed prior to being posted. Multiple language models are used to assist with verification.